WebDec 1, 2024 · The full bench managed to distinguish this matter from 'slip and trip' cases, which, in terms of the judgment in Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd v Silberman,5 would have required the court to hold the independent cleaning company liable for … WebNov 17, 2016 · Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman – LindsayKeller Attorneys 2009 (1) SA 265 (SCA) On behalf of the appellant. Setting out the liability, if …
A Legal Analysis of the Collision and Strict Liability ... - Springer
WebChartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman [1] [2] is an important case in the South African law of agency. It was heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal by Scott JA, Nugent JA, Ponnan JA, Maya JA and Leach AJA on May 14, 2008. They delivered judgment on … WebThere is only one principle, the court found: To determine whether the plaintiff’s damages are too remote from the defendant’s act to hold the defendant liable therefor, considerations of policy (reasonableness, fairness and justice) … buster\\u0027s place covington
A Legal Analysis of the Collision and Strict Liability ... - Springer
WebThe 1Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd v Silberman 2009 1 SA 265 (SCA). appellants filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of Appeal against the ruling. The court held that the second party in this contractual undertaking was not to be held liable and that the owners of the shopping centre were to be held liable for the damages to the respondent 2. WebChartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman[1][2]is an important case in the South African law of agency. It was heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal by Scott JA, Nugent JA, Ponnan JA, Maya JA and Leach AJA on May 14, 2008. They delivered judgment on September 25. Facts WebJul 20, 2024 · Furthermore, in the case of Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman [2009] (1) SA 265 (SCA), the Supreme Court of Appeal held and confirmed … cchc creekside primary care