Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

Author: iikc

August undefined, 2024

WebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 413 (5th Cir. 2013 ). The standard for withholding of removal or CAT protection “is even higher than the standard for asylum, requiring a … WebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 412 (5th Cir. 2013) (explaining that credible testimony may establish the persecutor’s motives); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1).

MARTINEZ NATAREN v. WHITAKER (2024) FindLaw

Webb26 apr. 2016 · Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir.2013). II. Petitioner argues that the BIA erred in denying him withholding of removal by rejecting his claim that, because of his … Webb14 sep. 2024 · Castillo-Martinez v. Garland, No. 20-60276 (5th Cir. 2024) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit chuck brand new vegan

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

729 F.3d 407 (5th Cir. 2013) In Sharma, the BIA had determined that the petitioner's mistreatment was motivated by legitimate reasons, and on appeal we readily observed the reasonableness of that conclusion. Visa mer The factual background of this case was established primarily through Sharma's own testimony, which the IJ found to be credible. Khagendra … Visa mer An alien is eligible for a discretionary grant of asylum if he qualifies as a refugee. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(A), (B)(i). A refugee is a person who is outside of his or her country and is unable or unwilling to return “because of … Visa mer “We review the decision of the BIA, and reach the underlying decision of the immigration judge only if that decision has some impact upon the BIA's opinion.” Ontunez–Tursios v. … Visa mer Accordingly, the petition for review is GRANTED, the BIA's decision is VACATED in part, the motion for stay of deportation pending review is GRANTED, and the case is REMANDED to the BIA for further proceedings … Visa mer Webb12 juli 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A)). ... This case is distinguishable from Sharma in which we held that the IJ's finding—affirmed by the BIA—that the petitioner failed to prove that he was persecuted on account of his political opinion was not supported by substantial evidence. Webb8 jan. 2014 · We review the BIA's order and will consider the underlying decision of the IJ only if it influenced the BIA's determination. Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and will reverse only if the record compels a different finding. chuck brannan macclenny

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH …

Revencu v. Sessions, 895 F.3d 396 Casetext Search + Citator

Webb14 mars 2024 · Zhang v. for Gonzales, 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). Under this highly deferential standard, we need only make sure that the BIA’s decision is “based upon the … Webb12 okt. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 412-13 (5th Cir. 2013). Rather, the IJ found Katembo was targeted because of his occupation as an election worker. Next, although Katembo testified at his hearing that he was targeted because of his work with CENI, IJ determined based on his asylum the chuck brannan florida houseWebb19 nov. 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). In light of inconsistencies discussed by the BIA, there is substantial evidence supporting the adverse credibility finding, and the evidence in the record does not compel a contrary conclusion. See Ghotra v. Whitaker, 912 F.3d 284, 289 (5th Cir. 2024). design fernand show cabinet

"WebbHolder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and will reverse only if the record … " - Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

MARTINEZ NATAREN v. WHITAKER (2024) FindLaw

Webb19 dec. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Because Martinez-Nataren has not shown that he is entitled to asylum, he cannot establish that he meets the higher standard for withholding for removal. See Majd v. … Webb26 apr. 2016 · Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir.2013). II. Petitioner argues that the BIA erred in denying him withholding of removal by rejecting his claim that, because of his reporting of the criminal activity of which he was a victim, he would be threatened with persecution in Mexico based on his “membership in a particular social group [ ] or …

Did you know?

Webb22 mars 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a) (42) (A) ). The burden is on the applicant to present "specific, detailed facts" to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear … Webb30 aug. 2013 · Sharma v. Holder 729 F.3d 407 5th Cir. Judgment Law CaseMine Browse cases United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. 2013 August Sharma v. …

WebbHolder, 562 F.3d 314 (5th Cir. 2009) Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit March 4, 2009 Also cited by 407 other opinions 1 reference to Carbajal-Gonzalez v. I.N.S., 78 F.3d 194 … Webb19 dec. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Because Martinez-Nataren has not shown that he is entitled to asylum, he cannot establish that he meets the higher standard for withholding for removal. See Majd v. …

Webb18 mars 2015 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411-13 (5th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, he cannot make the more difficult showing of an objective "clear probability" that he will be … Webb11 mars 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). An alien does not have a well-founded fear of future persecution if he could avoid persecution by relocating to another part of his country "if under all the circumstances it would be reasonable to expect the applicant to do so." 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13 (b) (2) (ii).

Webb30 aug. 2013 · Holder , 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i) ). It may not be "incidental, tangential, or subordinate to another reason …

Webb29 nov. 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (citations omitted). Un-der the substantial evidence standard, this court may not reverse a factual finding unless the evidence “compels” such a reversal — i.e., the evidence design fellowshipsWebbFind many great new & used options and get the best deals for 2007 VOLVO C70 MK2 FRONT RIGHT DRIVER SIDE PILLAR TRIM COVER 1385359 at the best online prices at … chuck braun obituaryWebb20 jan. 2014 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and will reverse only if the record compels a different finding. Id. To show that he is eligible for asylum, Gharti-Magar has the burden of design fire consultants phone numberWebb3 mars 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Regarding the credibility issue, an adverse credibility determination is a factual finding. Singh v. Sessions, 880 … design fire flow rateWebb30 aug. 2013 · The factual background of this case was established primarily through Sharma's own testimony, which the IJ found to be credible. [729 F.3d 410] Khagendra … chuck brannon state repWebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 412 (5th Cir. 2013) Nexus/One Central Reason Matter of C-T-L-, 25 I&N Dec. 341 (BIA 2010) CAT Framework Garcia v. Holder, 756 F.3d 885, 891 … chuck brenner facebookWebb18 jan. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013); Thuri v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 788, 792 (5th Cir. 2004). Lazo-Casula has not shown that anyone in El Salvador is aware of his political opinion of opposing the gangs or would be motivated to persecute him for that opinion. An asylum claim may also be based on membership in a particular ... design files free trial